WebDec 18, 2024 · Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Crompton Greaves Ltd. Appeal No.: Civil Appeal No. 2153 of 2010: Judgment Date: 18-Dec-19: Court/Bench: Supreme Court of …

Commercial Courts Act, 2016 and Trade Mark Suits

WebWhen Crompton Greaves Limited. found that there is some issue in the initiation of work, hence, terminated the contract. Dyna. technologies sought reimbursement for untimely ending and after this controversy was referred. to arbitration. The arbitration tribunal granted reimbursement but failed to mention any specific. WebCrompton Greaves Limited (hereinafter referred to as “CGL” in short) for an aquaculture unit to be set up by such Principal, namely, DCM. CGL invited tenders for carrying out certain works for construction of ponds, channels, drains and associated works. The appellant M/s Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. gave its proposal, estimate and quotation ... iray th50c

SEAMEC v. OIL: Supreme Court on Power to Examine Plausibility of ...

WebMar 27, 2024 · The Court inter aliacited the cases of Dyna Technologies (P) Ltd vs Crompton Greaves Ltd andIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Shree Ganesh Petroleum, Rajgurunagar, in which the Apex Court had held and reaffirmed that the court should have limited intervention in the interpretation given by an Arbitral Tribunal of a contractual … Webinterpreted by the Courts. Recently, this Court in Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Crompton Greaves Ltd. [2024 SCC Online SC 1656] laid down the scope of such interference. This … WebJun 3, 2024 · Reference was also made to the decision in the case of Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Crompton Greaves wherein it was held that arbitral awards should not be interfered with in a casual and cavalier manner, unless the Court comes to a conclusion that the perversity of the award goes to the root of the matter without there being a possibility ... order alcohol online alberta